Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Us Defense Policy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Us Defense Policy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Us Defense Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos