Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video732 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Charles Harry Meghan Montecito Sussexes Richard Eden results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.6% saturation with 1,277 hits. Analysis detected 6,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,692 of 16,562 topics). This Us Charles Harry Meghan Montecito Sussexes Richard Eden is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Us Charles Harry Meghan Montecito Sussexes Richard Eden
Topic details
Total words: 2,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 43.6%43.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 9.4%9.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 43.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos