Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urology results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 63.7% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 390 faulty-reasoning hits from 240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (307 of 16,562 topics). This Urology is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Urology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 240
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510098.2% percentile
18.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles240 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 63.8%63.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 21.3%21.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.6%9.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Topic 63.8%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos