Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Safety results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 254 hits. Analysis detected 2,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,952 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Urban Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos