Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video1,379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Living results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 2,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,137 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (9,772 of 15,739 topics). This Urban Living is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Urban Living
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,137
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos