Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Heat Island Effect results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 3,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,190 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Heat Island Effect is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Urban Heat Island Effect
Topic details
Total words: 2,984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.0%21.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos