Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Farming results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,891 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Farming is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Urban Farming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos