Topic summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Exploration results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 518 hits. Analysis detected 2,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,152 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Exploration is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Urban Exploration
Topic details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.8%11.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos