Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Development And Environment results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,323 hits. Analysis detected 7,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,603 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Development And Environment is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Urban Development And Environment
Topic details
Total words: 6,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.7%20.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos