Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uranium Enrichment results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 785 hits. Analysis detected 3,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,768 of 16,562 topics). This Uranium Enrichment is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Uranium Enrichment
Topic details
Total words: 5,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.6%15.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos