Topic summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 1,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Upcycling results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Hindsight Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 371 hits . Analysis detected 1,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,329 of 16,562 topics). This Upcycling is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Upcycling
Topic details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst