Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video385 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Minnesota results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 2,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,155 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,164 of 16,562 topics). This University Of Minnesota is worse (more manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
University Of Minnesota
Topic details
Total words: 1,155
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.0% percentile
10.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 42.1%42.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 18.7%18.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 18.7%18.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.5%36.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.7%10.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 42.1%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 36.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.6%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos