Topic summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,095 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Administration results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 592 hits. Analysis detected 4,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,265 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,904 of 16,562 topics). This University Administration is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
University Administration
Topic details
Total words: 3,265
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.1%18.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos