Topic summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,911 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,810 of 16,562 topics). This United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania
Topic details
Total words: 1,911
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos