Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Department Of The Treasury results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,317 hits. Analysis detected 7,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,655 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,564 of 15,825 topics). This United States Department Of The Treasury is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
United States Department Of The Treasury
Topic details
Total words: 5,655
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos