Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Union Politics results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,268 of 16,562 topics). This Union Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Union Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Horn Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos