Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Union Pacific Railroad results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 465 hits. Analysis detected 2,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,809 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,820 of 16,562 topics). This Union Pacific Railroad is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Union Pacific Railroad
Topic details
Total words: 1,809
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.7%19.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.7%25.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos