Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Union results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 82% saturation with 812 hits . Analysis detected 2,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 990 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of 97% (586 of 16,562 topics). This Union is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Union
Topic details
Total words: 990
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.5% percentile 14.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles990 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 82.0% 82.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 27.3% 27.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 21.7% 21.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 17.8% 17.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 22.0% 22.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 27.0% 27.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Topic 82.0%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Bandwagon: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst