Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Underground Structures results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 2,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,410 of 16,562 topics). This Underground Structures is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Underground Structures
Topic details
Total words: 2,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos