Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Underground Reactors results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 1,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,945 of 16,452 topics). This Underground Reactors is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Underground Reactors
Topic details
Total words: 2,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 25.1%25.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos