Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Underground Railroad results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 4,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,490 of 16,562 topics). This Underground Railroad is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Underground Railroad
Topic details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos