Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ultra Wealthy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 735 hits. Analysis detected 7,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,251 of 16,559 topics). This Ultra Wealthy is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Ultra Wealthy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,208
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.5%17.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos