Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ukraine Russia Conflict results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 2,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,981 of 16,562 topics). This Ukraine Russia Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Ukraine Russia Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 3,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos