Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uk Criminal Justice results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 773 hits. Analysis detected 3,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,671 of 16,562 topics). This Uk Criminal Justice is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Uk Criminal Justice
Topic details
Total words: 4,792
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos