Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uganda results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 3,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,190 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,989 of 16,559 topics). This Uganda is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Uganda
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,190
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate