Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Uconn Huskies results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,383 hits. Analysis detected 8,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,204 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,009 of 15,414 topics). This Uconn Huskies is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Uconn Huskies
Topic details
Total words: 7,204
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.2%19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos