Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.s. Trade Policy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 3,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,267 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,998 of 16,562 topics). This U.s. Trade Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
U.s. Trade Policy
Topic details
Total words: 3,267
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos