Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Senate Race results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 5,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,140 of 16,562 topics). This U S Senate Race is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
U S Senate Race
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos