Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Military Action results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 64% saturation with 476 hits . Analysis detected 3,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21% and a BS Rank of 99% (211 of 16,558 topics). This U S Military Action is worse (more manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. U S Military Action
Topic details
Total words: 744
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.7% percentile 21.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles744 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 64.0% 64.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 47.0% 47.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 54.8% 54.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 62.2% 62.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 37.2% 37.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 30.2% 30.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 40.5% 40.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 23.5% 23.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% In-Group Bias: Topic 64.0%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Topic 62.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 54.8%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 47.0%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Topic 40.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 37.2%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 23.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 14.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst