Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Dominican Relations results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.8% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 2,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,194 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,179 of 16,562 topics). This U S Dominican Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
U S Dominican Relations
Topic details
Total words: 1,194
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.9% percentile
10.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 51.8%51.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.9%21.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 30.9%30.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.2%22.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.4%11.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 51.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Horn Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos