Topic summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 685 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S And Iran War results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 253 hits . Analysis detected 896 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,055 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (11,625 of 16,562 topics). This U S And Iran War is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. U S And Iran War
Topic details
Total words: 2,055
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst