Topic summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video1,495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Type 1 Diabetes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 2,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,485 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,126 of 16,562 topics). This Type 1 Diabetes is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Type 1 Diabetes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,485
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.2%10.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos