Topic summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Two Way Contract results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 171 hits . Analysis detected 1,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,782 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (7,596 of 15,407 topics). This Two Way Contract is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Two Way Contract
Topic details
Total words: 1,782
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst