Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tv Series Analysis results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 523 hits . Analysis detected 2,465 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,574 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Tv Series Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Tv Series Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 2,574
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst