Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video1,602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tv Couples results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 399 hits. Analysis detected 3,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,806 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (13,039 of 16,562 topics). This Tv Couples is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Tv Couples
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠22%Tv Couples (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,806
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos