Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tungsten results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 1,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Tungsten is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tungsten
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles928 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.7%3.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos