Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tsa Screening results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 514 hits. Analysis detected 4,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,575 of 15,902 topics). This Tsa Screening is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Tsa Screening
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠72%Tsa Screening (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos