Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trust In Science results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 498 hits. Analysis detected 3,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,250 of 16,551 topics). This Trust In Science is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.
Trust In Science
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,712
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos