Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Vance Parting Words Iran Talks results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 925 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,808 of 16,562 topics). This Trump Vance Parting Words Iran Talks is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Trump Vance Parting Words Iran Talks
Topic details
Total words: 1,504
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.0%13.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.7%7.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos