Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Economy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 359 hits . Analysis detected 3,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,198 of 15,344 topics). This Trump Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Trump Economy
Topic details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst