Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Economy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 3,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,198 of 15,344 topics). This Trump Economy is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Trump Economy
Topic details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos