Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Triple Crown results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 221 faulty-reasoning hits from 702 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,796 of 16,562 topics). This Triple Crown is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Triple Crown
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 702
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.1% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles702 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.8%18.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos