Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trip And Fall results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 1,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,517 of 15,757 topics). This Trip And Fall is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Trip And Fall
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.6%31.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.9%19.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.2%26.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos