Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tributes results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 320 hits. Analysis detected 2,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,666 of 16,562 topics). This Tributes is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Tributes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos