Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tribal Law results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 615 hits . Analysis detected 4,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,737 of 16,562 topics). This Tribal Law is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Tribal Law
Topic details
Total words: 5,868
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst