Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Treasury Revenue results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 59.3% saturation with 1,383 hits. Analysis detected 6,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,334 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,211 of 16,562 topics). This Treasury Revenue is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Treasury Revenue
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠93%Treasury Revenue (selected)11%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,334
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.7% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 39.9%39.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 59.3%59.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 28.2%28.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.1%20.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.3%14.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 59.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 39.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 28.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos