Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trash results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 2,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,751 of 16,562 topics). This Trash is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Trash
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.3%24.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos