Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transgender Health Care results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.8% saturation with 1,543 hits. Analysis detected 7,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,383 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (760 of 15,399 topics). This Transgender Health Care is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Transgender Health Care
Topic details
Total words: 2,383
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.1% percentile
12.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 64.8%64.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 35.6%35.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 24.9%24.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 37.3%37.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 38.0%38.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 15.7%15.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.5%15.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 8.1%8.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 64.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 38.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 37.3%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 35.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos