Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video2,383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transaction Costs results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Overconfidence Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,149 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (15,663 of 15,765 topics). This Transaction Costs is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Transaction Costs
Topic details
Total words: 7,149
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos