Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trademark Infringement results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (13,009 of 16,562 topics). This Trademark Infringement is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Trademark Infringement
Topic details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos