Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trade War results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 3,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,184 of 16,562 topics). This Trade War is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Trade War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 14.0%14.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.8%7.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.2%33.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos